Pankaj Ghemawat on Globalisation-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp

Questions: 1.Discuss about the Ford and Taylorism. 2.Discuss about the Pankaj Ghemawat on Globalisation. Answers: 1.Ford and Taylorism This activity shows the influence of management on the way in which employees perform. Initially, work was being done so slowly because the company was operating based on craftsmanship. The cars were also so expensive because only the rich could afford them. Tylor operated based on time because he believed that workers performance can only be analysed based on the time they took to complete a particular task. When Taylor came to this company, he clearly demonstrated that one does not need to focus on talent in monetary system because money is the talent which one requires to be powerful and talented. From the activity, Taylor seems to be a tyrant who disliked craftsmanship. When he came, he ensured there was further control to managers and undermined the dignity of craftsmanship. He also ensured there were several steps involved in production and each step was performed by different people. His perception to craftsmanship and several things he rearranged changed productivity. Job was done quickly and more cars could be produced than before. The idea of operating based on time is the primary factor which led to the need of establishing new ways of doing things in this company (Koji, 2014). Initially, the company was depending too much on man labour which contributed to high cost of production, high selling prices, and lack of high quality cars among others. With the high demand of working based on time, there was introduction of machines, division of labour, and conveyer belt among other facilities which increased the speed of doing things. From this activity, one can learn that production is always impacted by ones management skills. Initially, the company used to produce few cars and with high production cost which made them to be sold at high prices. Afterwards, production was highly changed by the manner in which Taylor managed the workers and introduced better ways of doing things. For example, the use of conveyer belts made materials to be delivered to the exact points as soon as they were needed (Gadenne, 2012). The use of machines and division of labour also played a significant role to have things done perfectly and within minimum time possible. This activity shows the importance of using good management skills to run an organization. When a company performs better through producing higher products at reduced costs, it is important to also appreciate those who have contributed to attaining the success. When the company started producing more cars than before with reduced production cost, employee salaries were raised and the company managed to offer more jobs as well (Wayne, 2014). Providing reasonable pay for hard work is fundamental because it makes employees to feel appreciated and see the importance of working with the organization. This activity should play a significant role for any manager or leader who wishes to direct his company in a manner which can assist it to be termed as successful. As a manger, one should understand what he wants the company to attain, what is required to attain it, the time required and what will be done if the desired results are obtained or not. 2.Pankaj Ghemawat on Globalisation According to Ghemawat, the world is not flat because goods, ideas and people do not flow freely. In this activity, he challenges Friedmans book titled the world is flat by claiming that the world is not connected or globalized as most people may think (Anon., n.d.). He asserts that the world does not have true connections because of the imbalance which exist between the poor and rich, small and large. Ghemawat argues that 90 percent of the fixed investments across the world is still very domesticated, and has not reached lower than 80 percent, meaning that only 10 percent contributes to international trade (Dang, 2010). He also argues that although the world has become more wired, people are yet to become more global, and that is the reason why there is lack of physical interactions with each other. To help the audience understand why he argues that the world is not flat, he gave them an over view of the statistics he had compiled over the last few years. These comprised of the percentage of the worlds population by the first generation immigrants, the percentage of investment that was accounted for in foreign direct investment, international voice call minutes that were accounted for by the cross boarder voice calls, export to GDP ratio among others. Based on this activity, it is clear that the world is yet to become flat because there are various matters which impact global aspects but they are not fully accounted in cross boarder perspective. Ghemawat provided some examples of these activities and said that although some of them are accounted for, real figures are not used. The world is not flat because if it was, there would be free flow of ideas, goods and people (Kunnanatt, 2013). There would be also interaction and integration of individuals, organizations and governments. Additionally, if the world is flat, today there would be easy communication and globalization would be fast. Even if some countries are advanced, others have long way to go especially those in the poorest countries and states. Although Ghemawat says the world is yet to become flat, he also sees a future where globalization is likely to become possible. This activity reveals the truth concerning why the world is not flat but gives people some hope that some years to come it might be possible to say that it has become flat. This activity shows that people should do things the way they are supposed to be done. For example, there should be proper accounting for data which is likely to influence globalization. Ghemewat says that some of the figures provided are either too high or too low, a factor which makes people to make wrong conclusion concerning if the world is flat or not (Satoshi, 2012). From this activity, it is clear that there are several factors which can make argue that globalization is yet to be attained. Conclusion From the first activity, it is clear that the manner in which organizations are managed determines their performance. Working based on time, valuing the use of machines and division of labour brought by Tylor made this company to produce many cars than before. From the second activity, the world is not yet flat because there is no flow of ideas, goods, and people. The other reason which makes it not flat is because various things which are not accounted for in the international perspective like for example information flow, flow of people, flow of capital and trade in products and service Bibliography Anon., n.d. ford and Taylorism. [Online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PdmNbqtDdI [Accessed tuesday august 2017]. Anon., n.d. Pankaj Ghemawat on Globalisation. [Online] Available at: Pankaj Ghemawat on Globalisation [Accessed Tuesaday august 2017]. Dang, T., 2010. Globalization Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in Developing Countries. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 9(1), pp. 87-98. Gadenne, D. J., 2012. The Association between Sustainability Performance Management Goals and Organisational Performance1. E - Journal of Social Behavioural Research in Business,, 3(2), pp. 89-97. Koji, Y., 2014. Spurious Correlation between Economies and Scale: Model T Ford Revisited. Annals of Business Administrative Science, 13(4), pp. 98-112. Kunnanatt, J. T., 2013. Globalization and Developing Countries: A Global Participation Model. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 8(4), pp. 21-34. Satoshi, M., 2012. Does Globalization Render People More Ethnocentric? Globalization and People's Views on Cultures. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71(2), pp. 87-90. Wayne, L., 2014. Thomas Fetzer, Paradoxes of Internationalization: British and German Trade Unions at Ford and General Motors, 1967-2000. Labour/Le Travail, Issue 73, pp. 78-90.